Resilvering works.Īs to the licensing issues, the question regards the legality of running OpenZFS on Linux with varying levels of integration. You keep mentioning these, but what do you mean by them? Pool resizing (well, expansion) is trivial, as is zvol expansion. That includes resizing and rebuilding - at least in my case. Swiss banks don’t get rich by managing the finances of your average Joe here in Switzerland, employed as any other… Swiss economy is mainly export based, be it manufacturing, heavy industries (Dam turbines), medical or financial services. Our high exchange rate relevant to the $ / £ / € doesn’t really help the economy as a whole. Yeah, then the client needs something like a MS-SQL based “App” Server, that needs 8-12 GB RAM to run (slowly), 16 would be OK.Įven living in Switzerland doesn’t mean everything’s gold… There aren’t that many filesystems i haven’t confronted in my 30+ years as self employed IT… Almost all OpenSource, and moct closed source, I can handle easily!
Smaller issues are - in my opinion of the english language - anything else besides legal issues. Recall what happened with OpenOffice and their team? When Oracle bought Sun, all that changed.
#OPENZFS LINUX MEMORY REQUIREMENTS FREE#
At the time it was bought by Sun, they had free hand in development. I can also understand the Dev-Teams frustration. I can understand why Larry Ellison, as owner of Oracle, would want to hem MySQL development as not to compete with his prime product. It’s not something a “techie” can solve, the issues behind these are mainly legal and restraints by such. Legal headaches…īut I agree with your summary about it mainly concerning those wanting to import an existing Oracle ZFS > v28…
Including that would mean backporting or reverse engineering or a SHIM or worse. Oracle ZFS Version is already stated as 29-35.
0 kommentar(er)
